From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 17 16:05:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66DD16A41C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:05:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jmartin37@speakeasy.net)
Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D8D43D55
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:05:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jmartin37@speakeasy.net)
Received: (qmail 21579 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2005 16:05:58 -0000
Received: from adsl-211-141-154.asm.bellsouth.net (HELO [192.168.2.101])
	(moonlightcheese@[68.211.141.154])
	(envelope-sender <jmartin37@speakeasy.net>)
	by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <dsze@distrust.net>; 17 Jun 2005 16:05:58 -0000
Message-ID: <42B2F4E2.4000507@speakeasy.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:05:54 -0400
From: JM <jmartin37@speakeasy.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Sze <dsze@distrust.net>
References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050617103807.058c6fa8@mail.distrust.net>
	<005c01c57354$3e877900$fe00a8c0@uzi>
	<42B2E9B5.7090803@goldsword.com> <42B2EC18.3030407@speakeasy.net>
	<20050617154149.GA94284@mail.distrust.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050617154149.GA94284@mail.distrust.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:05:59 -0000

David Sze wrote:

>On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:28:24AM -0400, JM wrote:
>  
>
>>i think you're missing the point... using CURRENT on a production 
>>machine is a bad idea...  the performance is great, but hardly worth the 
>>risk of breaking something.
>>    
>>
>
>Under normal circumstances I'd agree, but -CURRENT is already in code
>freeze in preparation for the upcoming 6.0 release:
>
>	http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html
>
>I also follow the cvs-src mailing list pretty closely, and I like the
>stability and performance increases that have gone into there.  It seems
>like most of them won't be backported to RELENG_5 because they break ABI
>compatibility.
>
>
>  
>
code freeze != glitch free XD