From nobody Thu Jun 10 20:22:44 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A19B7E99CC; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:22:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch (mail-4316.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.16]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G1FlX1MDNz4YLr; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:22:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a9development.com; s=protonmail; t=1623356565; bh=i/Oay3cYGx8mgAz42dQdVdbT+Be6kfo/AzQMS1o+euk=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=beJJ1zoopEEBHgTzs0DOlIt5dDZQSABcwFlTHBnp7XPbwI1LyX/8GJOfdUrLqJ0v5 nPO7/hhpG1IAeMm95E8uVHZUXWThic7BnNjYS9BHpDiyYD0MkVmGm6RXq6dut+FQNQ +gygs6kpsOBvB51K3xEfStnOIiias7gY4EOue/8w= To: Dmitry Salychev From: Dan Kotowski Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Reply-To: Dan Kotowski Subject: Re: U-Boot for HoneyComb LX2 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <198F84BF-5932-4E58-BCE3-CC33B185923A@lists.zabbadoz.net> List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4G1FlX1MDNz4YLr X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=a9development.com header.s=protonmail header.b=beJJ1zoo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=a9development.com; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan.kotowski@a9development.com has no SPF policy when checking 185.70.43.16) smtp.mailfrom=dan.kotowski@a9development.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.80 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[dan.kotowski@a9development.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[a9development.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[185.70.43.16:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[a9development.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[a9development.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[185.70.43.16:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.43.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm,freebsd-hackers] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > > I=E2=80=99ve got a local tree (on Jan 2021, needs updating to latest an= d > > > > re-test before > > > > submit) for the uEFI firmware (not u-boot). > > Btw, do you have that tree available somewhere? Did you manage to > > load a blob from NXP and initialize DPAA2 MC? > > Regards, > > Dmitry Hmm, so this went to my spambox... You REALLY wanna stick to UEFI for FreeBSD on lx2160 if you can. We did a l= ot of work to get the PCIe BAR space and ACPI tables sorted a while back an= d it's been basically stable for a while. And you can get their prebuilt BS= P images here: https://images.solid-run.com/LX2k/lx2160a_uefi As for DPAA2, we just don't support it today and afaict there's no plans to= in the future other than the dreams in my head and I just don't have the t= ime to implement it myself. I've been trying to drum up some support for it= though and seeing a few more names on the "I wish we had this" list is alw= ays good :) --Dan Kotowski