From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 27 18:49:00 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEC81065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net)
Received: from ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net
	[80.76.153.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B946D8FC12
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:48:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from c83-255-51-20.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.51.20]:55305
	helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net)
	by ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.73)
	(envelope-from <erikt@midgard.homeip.net>) id 1Q3v0x-0001uS-H9
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:48:41 +0200
Received: (qmail 3951 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2011 20:48:37 +0200
Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7)
	by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2011 20:48:37 +0200
Received: (qmail 36248 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Mar 2011 20:48:37 +0200
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:48:37 +0200
From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To: Subbsd <subbsd@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110327184837.GA36228@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
References: <BANLkTinymz5kjuysy1dFqoOkhTmUqHVheg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinymz5kjuysy1dFqoOkhTmUqHVheg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Originating-IP: 83.255.51.20
X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Q3v0x-0001uS-H9.
X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net 1Q3v0x-0001uS-H9
	71f4d94fd714ca31e8ffd996f677ef09
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: why vim ports have personal KNOBS for options
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:49:00 -0000

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote:
> Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed
> via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define
> WITH_OPTIONS=yes in make.conf (or WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=yes). Life without
> it is so difficult ;)

Because the maintainer of the vim port has a dislike for the OPTIONS
framework.



-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se