From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 22 09:55:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720678AF; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patpro@patpro.net) Received: from rack.patpro.net (rack.patpro.net [193.30.227.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A448FC0C; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack.patpro.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABD11CC020; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:49:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at patpro.net Received: from amavis-at-patpro.net ([127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (rack.patpro.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id edlWUJM_a4jj; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:49:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:49:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Strange problem with... ZFS? Disk? Controller? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--94572848; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 From: Patrick Proniewski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <1664598999.20121222010110@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:49:08 +0100 Message-Id: <099C403F-E339-45A4-B83A-4247DFA4E38F@patpro.net> References: <50D56D4B.4060709@webmail.sub.ru> <1664598999.20121222010110@cs.ucla.edu> To: Derek Kulinski X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:55:38 -0000 --Apple-Mail-4--94572848 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On 22 d=E9c. 2012, at 10:01, Derek Kulinski wrote: > Your drive is 2TB, and according to this the bigger the drive the more > likely you'll run into problems like these: > = http://forums.storagereview.com/index.php/topic/27994-smart-hardware-ecc-r= ecovered-values/ Thanks Derek for this interesting pointer. It's the first time I read = about problem like this... It's frightful. I had no idea big drives = could have such problems. Any other source that would confirm the issue? patpro= --Apple-Mail-4--94572848--