Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 03:49:20 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: big PLIST_FILES patch Message-ID: <401AFB90.1080602@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040130212130.GA86224@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040130133028.V74416@blues.jpj.net> <20040130212130.GA86224@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:45:24PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: > >>I've noticed that many ports have just one line in their packing list. >>I've made a patch to use the PLIST_FILES variable in place of most these >>simple packing lists, in order to reduce the numbers of inodes and blocks >>that users need to unpack the ports collection. This patch would affect >>1,217 ports. There are 50-odd pkg-plist files that just have a comment in >>them; this patch doesn't address those (I have a hunch that they could >>just be removed without causing problems). [skipped] > When do you think you'll be able to fix all those plist problems in > your ports, and other port build failures? I'd prefer you did this > before working on other port changes, since they've been broken for > going on 3 months or more now. But Kris, 1217 ports is a quite big work. Agreed? -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?401AFB90.1080602>