From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 30 23:21:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA12916 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA12911 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA18733 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:21:36 -0700 (PDT) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/src/etc/Makefile install rule. Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:21:36 -0700 Message-ID: <18731.862467696@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Would anyone have any objections if this suddenly went from being a no-op to installing: rc rc.firewall rc.network rc.serial rc.pccard etc.i386/rc.i386 Into /etc? Only /etc/rc.conf and /etc/rc.local are supposed to be customized, so that would make the other rc files "generic" enough to simply install (and if one's not, we should fix that rather than not install it). For rc.conf, we might also emit a little message at install time which reminds those looking through the output to migrate their old rc.conf by hand. rc.local is just a skeleton and should never need updating - it's purely a user configuration choice. Comments? Jordan