From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 23 14:26:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4BDDA16A4CF; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 409F143D2F; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:26:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa00292@salmon>; 23 Mar 2004 22:26:20 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:26:19 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20040323222619.GA6750@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <20040312010000.GA9949@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
	<200403121051.aa75277@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
	<20040312170629.GB7661@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <ygefzbzzdid.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ygefzbzzdid.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
cc: dwmalone@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: inetd needs "discard" service in /etc/services
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:26:22 -0000

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:20:26AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> How about this patch?

Looks good to me, if it fixes Brooks's problem.

> brooks> The real problem is that we should either not use getaddrinfo to make
> brooks> sockaddrs or we should do it on demand when we actually have what we
> brooks> need (i.e. a service name and protocol).
> 
> It seems NetBSD's inetd do it on demand.

I guess I should look at importing NetBSD's way of doing it.

	David.