From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jun 22 11:34:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA27946
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.16.108])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA27940;
          Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA02351; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu>
cc: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>, Peter Mutsaers <plm@xs4all.nl>,
        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jun 1996 12:00:07 EDT."
             <Pine.OSF.3.91.960622115222.8870B-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu> 
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:41:15 -0700
Message-ID: <2349.835465275@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>True, but the tcl move seems to raise other questions, doesn't it ...
>like, why should we have tcl without tk?  If we have tk, shouldn't we 
>have XFree86?

Tk is an extension to Tcl, it is not an integral part, and since we don't
have X11 as standard, we will not hav tk as standard.

Easy, isn't it ?

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.