From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 19 11:18:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD571065670 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from mailbox.rainbownet.com (89-97-230-177.ip19.fastwebnet.it [89.97.230.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015778FC25 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from 192.168.44.64 ([151.51.49.88]) (authenticated user aturetta@rainbownet.com) by rainbownet.com (mailbox.rainbownet.com [127.0.0.1]) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.6.R) with ESMTP id 11-md50000000512.tmp for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:06:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4881CABB.7080907@commit.it> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:06:35 +0200 From: Angelo Turetta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rudi Kramer - MWEB References: <047001c8e87d$8078b710$816a2530$@com><048f01c8e889$160fffd0$422fff70$@com> <39DC135F7F0571489196E0B6F5D58B4A03B45EED@MWBEXCH.mweb.com> In-Reply-To: <39DC135F7F0571489196E0B6F5D58B4A03B45EED@MWBEXCH.mweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: aturetta@rainbownet.com X-Spam-Processed: mailbox.rainbownet.com, Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:06:38 +0200 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 151.51.49.88 X-Return-Path: aturetta@commit.it X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GRE Limitation X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:18:16 -0000 Rudi Kramer - MWEB wrote: > I had the same issue and when I checked with our ms-admin team they said > it was a Microsoft limitation. Quite the opposite. Since Windows2000 MS introduced, or started using, a CallID in the GRE header. Remember, many-to-one NAT has only become widely used/mandatory in recent years, I remember getting a full ClassC subnet from my first provider (128Kbps, ca. 1995-1996) without even asking. Angelo Turetta Modena - Italy