From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 28 23:29:55 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C52116A40F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from niwun.pair.com (niwun.pair.com [209.68.2.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DA7543D70
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 55573 invoked by uid 3193); 28 Sep 2006 23:29:53 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
	by localhost with SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 23:29:53 -0000
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:29:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
X-X-Sender: silby@niwun.pair.com
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <451C4850.5030302@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0609281928020.20971@niwun.pair.com>
References: <451C4850.5030302@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, gallatin@cs.duke.edu
Subject: Re: Much improved sosend_*() functions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:55 -0000


On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Andre Oppermann wrote:

> over it an copies the data into the mbufs by using uiomove().  sosend_dgram()
> and sosend_generic() are change to use m_uiotombuf() instead of sosend_copyin().

Can you do some UDP testing with 512b, 1K, 2K, 4K, 8K, and 16K packets to
see if performance changes there as well?

How about local sockets?

Impressive improvements for TCP, in any case!

Mike "Silby" Silbersack