From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Jul 18 23:04:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650EB9D77C for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347C1168D for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6IN4YVC035739 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:04:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211152] benchmarks/iozone: Build fails on typedef redefinition with different types ('long long' vs '__off64_t' (aka 'long')) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:04:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markmi@dsl-only.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:04:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211152 --- Comment #24 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #23) When I applied the new patch for 3.444 use to benchmarks/iozone in -r418253= of /user/ports the messages were normal (see later below after I show the build problem) but when I tried to build benchmarks/iozone it failed with problems for applying patch-libasync.c : =3D=3D=3D> Found saved configuration for iozone-3.434 =3D=3D=3D> iozone-3.444 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by iozone-3.444 for building =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for iozone-3.444 =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for iozone3_444.tgz. =3D=3D=3D> Patching for iozone-3.444 =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for iozone-3.444 No such line 1217 in input file, ignoring 32 out of 33 hunks failed--saving rejects to libasync.c.rej =3D> Patch patch-libasync.c failed to apply cleanly. =3D> Patch(es) patch-iozone.c applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone Your patch does not include anything for libasync.c and so leaves the older patch-libasync.c in place. FYI. . . Applying your patch to -r418253 of /usr/ports and its benchmarks/iozone reported: Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: Makefile |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |--- Makefile (revision 418690) |+++ Makefile (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2 with fuzz 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 12. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: distinfo |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |--- distinfo (revision 418690) |+++ distinfo (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: files/patch-iozone.c |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |--- files/patch-iozone.c (revision 418690) |+++ files/patch-iozone.c (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file files/patch-iozone.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: files/patch-pit_server.c |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |--- files/patch-pit_server.c (revision 418690) |+++ files/patch-pit_server.c (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file files/patch-pit_server.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. done (I cleaned out the 4 generated .orig files after this.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=