From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 9 8:48:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C708214BF1 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 08:48:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA29007; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 08:44:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <199908091544.IAA29007@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: continued crashes with 3.1-Stable In-Reply-To: from Seth at "Aug 9, 99 08:32:46 am" To: seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org (Seth) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 08:44:00 -0700 (MST) Cc: tcobb@staff.circle.net, lightningweb@hotmail.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, greg@lightningweb.com, jeremy@lightningweb.com, keith@lightningweb.com, criter@lightningweb.com Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Seth wrote: > My intention, of course, was not to start a war over who could > generate the most load. You win. :) > > Keep in mind that load can represent the lack of processing capability > of your machine as jobs are queued up 'cause they can't find CPU time > in which to complete.... Ah. You're running Solaris. That explains > it. :) Actually, that machine is a Pyramid, running SysVr4 (Pyramid calls it DC/OSx). It's the machine our developers (ab)use. But it does set a standard for grace/stability under load. Even Pyramid is impressed. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message