From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 21 11:53:28 2000 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 21 11:53:27 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from herd.plethora.net (herd.plethora.net [205.166.146.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B578B37B400 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from guild.plethora.net (root@guild.plethora.net [205.166.146.8]) by herd.plethora.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA06577 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:53:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from guild.plethora.net (seebs@localhost.plethora.net [127.0.0.1]) by guild.plethora.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA01714 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:53:24 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200012211953.NAA01714@guild.plethora.net> From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sitting on hands (no longer Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:53:04 PST." Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:53:24 -0600 Sender: seebs@plethora.net Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , "SteveB" wri tes: >It would just make pitching FreeBSD and other open OS's in the >enterprise a lot easier if there was an QA process that official >releases went through. There might be; I haven't looked. I am pretty happy with the results of whatever's being done now, so maybe the right thing to do is document it. ;) >Also volunteering to QA would be a good >training ground to gain familiarity with a OS and a chance to >communicate with developers. True. One of the nice things about the BSD's is that, while anyone can develop code and contribute it, there's a certain amount of review it has to pass before it's actually *USED*. -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message