Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:37:24 +0000 From: adr@SDF.ORG To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: efifb on h3? Message-ID: <20200624213724.GC4906@SDF.ORG> In-Reply-To: <Jq3UGQBI4iusoti43254azAoA7pZmWKRWPWmH-RnLpBfm2Vh2S10ZK3czC2SZyPdFrPjLqGn1uJOMPRj-9AYPV9xZiTRdf-jhkuBYpejFN4=@protonmail.com> References: <20200624180156.GA4906@SDF.ORG> <Jq3UGQBI4iusoti43254azAoA7pZmWKRWPWmH-RnLpBfm2Vh2S10ZK3czC2SZyPdFrPjLqGn1uJOMPRj-9AYPV9xZiTRdf-jhkuBYpejFN4=@protonmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:40:56PM +0000, Robert Crowston wrote: > Not an expert on this board, but first step would be to get the verbose dmesg. > -- RHC. > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 19:01, <adr@SDF.ORG> wrote: > > > Hello, first of all excuse me if this mail end up duplicated. > > > > Could someone point me to the pieces that are missing to allow > > allwinner h3 boards to use the framebuffer set by u-boot? > > > > Thanks, > > adr. > > > > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm Oh, I've read the mail archives and the documentation, so before digging into it I would apreciate if some developer points me to the issues. Of course, if I got it wrong and this boards are supposed to be able to use the u-boot framebuffer I will report the info. adr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200624213724.GC4906>