From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 9 20:36:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA07315 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 20:36:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from watermarkgroup.com (lor.watermarkgroup.com [207.202.73.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA07310 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 20:36:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luoqi@watermarkgroup.com) Received: by watermarkgroup.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06453; Sat, 9 May 98 23:36:02 EDT Date: Sat, 9 May 98 23:36:02 EDT From: luoqi@watermarkgroup.com (Luoqi Chen) Message-Id: <9805100336.AA06453@watermarkgroup.com> To: julian@whistle.com, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Subject: Re: Soft Updates Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian Elischer wrote: > > Kirk had some very good arguments but I forget what they were.. > Maybe fsck needs some special processing for softupdates after a crash? > > On Sun, 10 May 1998, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > According to Julian Elischer: > > > you need to use the -n option of tunefs on an unmounted filesystem > > > it's not a mount option.. > > > > Why not BTW ? async/noasync are mount options so one could expect > > softupdates to be the same. Is there an reason for the current scheme (not > > that I mind but it would make switch it on/off easier, especially for /). > > -- > > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #8: Tue Apr 21 02:45:53 CEST 1998 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message