From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 14:45:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8F116A4CE; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:45:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from burka.carrier.kiev.ua (burka.carrier.kiev.ua [193.193.193.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E4543D45; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:45:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netch@lucky.net) Received: from burka.carrier.kiev.ua (netch@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by burka.carrier.kiev.ua with ESMTP id i8KEjJPe070927; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:45:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch@burka.carrier.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by burka.carrier.kiev.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8KEjJZA070924; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:45:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:45:19 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20040920144519.GJ89036@lucky.net> References: <20040920112733.GE84228@lucky.net> <99367.1095682142@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040920121913.GH89036@lucky.net> <20040920130316.GA44861@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040920130316.GA44861@ip.net.ua> X-42: On X-Verify-Sender: Address has been verified (burka.carrier.kiev.ua) cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] naming of tty devices. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: netch@lucky.net List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:45:30 -0000 Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 16:03:16, ru wrote about "Re: [HEADSUP] naming of tty devices.": > To answer your question: when given "-t d1", both now and then > it will convert it to /dev/ttyd1 and /dev/d1. If you need > both callout and callin devices, "-t /dev/ttyd1 -t /dev/cuaa1" > should be used. And you can always use "-O tty" to see the > full tty name. Well, this means a bunch of crutches instead of one simple solution. But if keeping "cua" in naming scheme is so important, I withdrew my comments. -netch-