Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 10:16:04 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu> To: Greg Kopp <gregkopp@en.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: curious Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960209101348.4170A-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <v01530501ad4102263c93@[206.148.86.218]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, Greg Kopp wrote: > I'm just a bit curious. I know FreeBSD is based on 4.4BSD-Lite, but how > close are either of these to the current commercial release of BSD/OS 2.0? FreeBSD IS 4.4-lite based. however, we had to make some changes so BSD/OS 2.0 binaries would work (I believe they are in -current, no?). > I'm sure the underlying code is much different, but what about the user > interface? The reason I ask is I'm considering buying BSD/OS 2.0, but I Why not just use FreeBSD all the time? Just as good an OS and a heck of a lot cheaper. :) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@gladstone.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960209101348.4170A-100000>