From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 11 21:51:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A20F16A4CE for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:51:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3E643D3F for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2BLpCZq056398; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:51:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <423212CC.90800@centtech.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:51:08 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Leffler References: <42313286.2060206@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <42313286.2060206@errno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.82/761/Thu Mar 10 15:01:48 2005 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: [Fwd: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile src/sys/conf files src/sys/modules/ath_rate_sample Makefile src/sys/i386/conf NOTES] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:51:17 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > If you''re an ath user on current it'd be great to get John some > feedback on his rate control algorithm as it might be made the default. > I've not tested it with 5210 or 5211 cards and it's likely to have some > issues with them so beware. To use it be sure you have up to date code > and then specify > > device ath_rate_sample > > instead of the normal ath_rate_onoe. So far, I see no additional performance, in fact, upload speeds are about 15-20% less compared to the onoe stuff. It's stable and seems to work ok for me however. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology I have seen the future and it is just like the present, only longer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------