Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:33:11 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= <maciphone2@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended arm hardware (mostly for compilation)? Message-ID: <9E10C464-474F-489A-A667-B263A64E78F2@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <47A5AF8A-1EB9-4721-94D5-B0A0A6FFF69B@unrelenting.technology> References: <1b109252-3232-05c4-e1e0-2fea4739583d@spth.de> <47A5AF8A-1EB9-4721-94D5-B0A0A6FFF69B@unrelenting.technology>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 14.05.2020 um 16:04 schrieb myfreeweb = <greg@unrelenting.technology>: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On May 14, 2020 1:34:52 PM UTC, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> = wrote: >> Can you recommend some hardware?=20 >=20 > AWS EC2 m6g instances :) >=20 >> RockPro64 - hardware seems okay, though only 4 GB of RAM. I've read = on >> this list thaat the big/little cores aren't handled well by FreeBSD. >=20 > There's no smart scheduler setting that would keep the big cores = occupied as much as possible for max performance, yes. > But if you don't need more parallelism than 2 cores, you can just = cpuset your workload to the big cores. >=20 >> MACCHIATObin - a bit on the expensive side, but still okay and has a = RAM >> slot. >=20 > It's great, it's the cheapest arm64 "Actual PC" you can get. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=E2=80=9C If someone=E2=80=99s looking for horsepower between those options, = consider the LX2K from SolidRun, while current support for FreeBSD is unknown to me .=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9E10C464-474F-489A-A667-B263A64E78F2>