From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Thu Sep 15 08:05:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB94BDBA21; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3473F1923; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759D3BDD40; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:05:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mat.cc; h=subject:to :references:cc:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=plouf; bh=+L30iodophp 21OW2FX7yFKx6fG8=; b=fjaOrAFQAgtmIafShSSRQ9BksEfy3PrDriti5KnoZ4x B2kCHTOEBIuKfHoO9hRzAkwsdIJLUAAevS8UETccZaSPNaMtW6szwK6HFJSHDCSc KiZSM0L0TiIpx1mnN+m673NRAAZ7oORewGlT+vUhFMXu6WcZDfxv8vh8oLCtWeIY = Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 599EFBDD31; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:05:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Heimdal in base To: Dewayne Geraghty , Benjamin Kaduk References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org> <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no> <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111181339.GE48728@zxy.spb.ru> <86io58flhk.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111184448.GR31314@zxy.spb.ru> <86egfu9z0j.fsf@desk.des.no> Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" From: Mathieu Arnold Message-ID: <60bf4983-2f43-5f7f-05a4-52b1c55c4746@mat.cc> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:05:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:32:23 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:05:24 -0000 Le 14/09/2016 =C3=A0 23:36, Dewayne Geraghty a =C3=A9crit : > Begs the question-what impact to FreeBSD distribution or use will US ex= port > control laws have, if FreeBSD migrated to MIT Kerberos? I don't think it would have any impact, these days, the restrictions, from what I understand, only apply to military grade hardware or military only encryption ciphers. --=20 Mathieu Arnold