From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jan 2 10: 7:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F71137B41B; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:07:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0051.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.42.51] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16LpnN-0002OT-00; Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:07:21 -0800 Message-ID: <3C334C5A.A5E56055@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:07:22 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen McKay Cc: Jordan Hubbard , Murray Stokely , John Baldwin , Alfred Perlstein , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xfree4 by default? References: <20011231183928.F37696@bsd.havk.org> <78699.1009878927@winston.freebsd.org> <200201021425.g02EPks11288@dungeon.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stephen McKay wrote: > >It wouldn't be that hard in sysinstall either, depending on how > >the X bits are packaged. FWIW, I also think that XFree86 4.x's time > >has come. > > None of my current video cards work properly with 3.3.6, so I'm all for > adding 4.1.0 immediately, rather than post release. Any chance? Yeah. Why isn't "X" a _package_ instead of a weird-ass tarball? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message