From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 24 19:20:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA05972 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 19:20:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from cedb.dpcsys.com (cedb.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA05967 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 19:20:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by cedb.dpcsys.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id CAA13232; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 02:20:14 GMT Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 19:20:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Busarow To: "jfesler@calweb.com" cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anti-spam in hub.mc In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971024173016.0099a1a0@pop.calweb.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, jfesler@calweb.com wrote: > Personally, mail to "postmaster" is *always* accepted over here. > Period. Regardless of other filters that are in place. Most of the > time, the error message I give out says to contact Postmaster, as > in may cases domain names are being used without consent of their owners. A domain or IP block only makes it into our filters after the postmaster there has made it clear that they don't care if someone sends spam from their site. (saying we can't do anything about spam amounts to don't care) I haven't blocked a relay site yet but I do have some candidates. Dan -- Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82