From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 10:57:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98E637B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642C43FBD for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:57:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73D666; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:57:52 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 42C2478C66; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:57:52 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:57:52 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: "Nikolaj I. Potanin" Message-ID: <20030331185752.GC40453@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , "Nikolaj I. Potanin" , David Wolfskill , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <200303311727.h2VHRLkN007598@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <329073853.20030331213623@drweb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <329073853.20030331213623@drweb.ru> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what was that? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:57:55 -0000 On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:36:23PM +0400, Nikolaj I. Potanin wrote: > >>Mar 31 19:31:15 cu sm-mta[5352]: h2VFVEGS005352: from=, > >>size=1737, class=0, nrcpts=1, > >>msgid= >>proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=wg.pu.ru [193.124.85.219] > > > I don't know if it "means" anything, but a message that an SMTP client > > tried to deliver to my SMTP server would be rejected, because it didn't > > have an '@' in it. > > Anyway, newly updated sendmail _did_ deliver this message, is there > any means to make it reject such kind of mail (i.e. containing illegal > msgid)? The Message-ID was not necessarily illegal. It was truncated by sendmail's log output, so you don't know what the complete Message-ID was. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se