From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Oct 10 13:20: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C4D37B66D for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA05490; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:20:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e9AKK2470915; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:20:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:20:02 -0400 (EDT) To: Doug Rabson Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: size problems with INVARIANTS/DIAGNOSTIC -current kernels In-Reply-To: References: <14818.16720.20802.44583@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14819.31072.8716.976218@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Doug Rabson writes: > I'm sorry, I think I meant *vtopte(kmemusage). I need to look at the pte > itself to see if its sane. I'm being extra dense too. Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. kmem_init: kmemusage = 0xfffffe0000296000 vtopte (kmemusage) = 0xffffffff80000a58 *(vtopte (kmemusage)) = 0x54b0003111f halted CPU 0 But -- why should the pte be sane yet? This is before the fault, which I thought should be the one to make it sane.. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message