From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 24 13:59: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFFB37B404; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C5A43E8A; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8094B1E067; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:59:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA24443; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:59:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id NAA26625; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200209242059.NAA26625@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: ache@nagual.pp.ru Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? Cc: peter@wemm.org, tjr@FreeBSD.ORG, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200209242043.NAA26380@windsor.research.att.com> <20020924205250.GC60957@nagual.pp.ru> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:59:02 -0700 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Please, no. They do the right thing. I guess there are varying definitions of what the right thing is. I don't think it's widely known that the +/- syntax was obsoleted. I am vaguely a standards weenie and I didn't know. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message