From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 13 11:35:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA11713 for current-outgoing; Mon, 13 May 1996 11:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA11700 for ; Mon, 13 May 1996 11:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0uJ2Rs-0003wdC; Mon, 13 May 96 11:34 PDT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA00246; Mon, 13 May 1996 18:34:17 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Chuck Robey cc: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHK malloc In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 May 1996 12:25:50 -0400." Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 18:34:14 +0000 Message-ID: <244.832012454@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I was looking at the code for ld.so, and I noticed that it carries it's > own version of malloc with it. How come Poul's malloc isn't used for the > run time loader? I have thought about it, but decided that it would take an actual move of malloc into ld.so if it were to make sense, and >that< didn't I concluded. I'd be happy if you prove me wrong :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.