From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jan 27 16:12:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA13514
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jan 1996 16:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu (root@RICH.ISDN.BCM.TMC.EDU [128.249.250.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA13506
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Jan 1996 16:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rich@localhost) by rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id SAA00526; Sat, 27 Jan 1996 18:12:30 -0600
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 18:12:30 -0600
Message-Id: <199601280012.SAA00526@rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu>
From: Rich Murphey <rich@lamprey.utmb.edu>
To: dennis@etinc.com
CC: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199601271751.MAA07911@etinc.com> (dennis@etinc.com)
Subject: Re: Multi-Port Async Cards
Reply-to: rich@lamprey.utmb.edu
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

|Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 12:51:45 -0500
|From: dennis@etinc.com (dennis)
|Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
|
|>> >async dial-in with Freebsd....as of the moment?
|>> >
|>> >Dennis
|>> >
|>> 
|>> Might I infer from the fact that no-one seems to have a (positive)
|opinion about
|>> this that FreeBSD is a particularly bad choice for this and Linux should be 
|>> recommended?
|>> 
|>> Dennis
|>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|>> Emerging Technologies, Inc.      http://www.etinc.com
|>
|>Flame bait ;-)
|
|only way to stir emotions in the passives.

Perhaps that is useful to you.  I personally think it
detracts from the discussions.  Rich