From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 9 22:54:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBE6CA840D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C46112A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BF028451; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:54:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AA2728426; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:54:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: Jan Bramkamp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> <5874135B.4000900@quip.cz> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <587414A3.1010206@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:54:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5874135B.4000900@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 22:54:30 -0000 Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/01/09 23:48: > Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30: >> On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> >>> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install >>> both samba44 >>> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >>> Or samba44 and KDE? >>> >>> If yes, then that sucks... >> >> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set >> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary >> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see >> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the >> complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable >> this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different >> licenses)? > > And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly? > We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper > variable / option for this. > > Miroslav Lachman I don't need SASL for LDAP client, but somebody messed up ports tree with WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL which is for users and not maintainers: # WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL # - User-defined variable to depend upon SASL-enabled OpenLDAP # client. Must NOT be set in a port Makefile. So why it is set there https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/databases/ldb/Makefile?r1=430417&r2=430416&pathrev=430417 and there https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net/samba43/Makefile?r1=429692&r2=429691&pathrev=429692 and maybe in some other places Miroslav Lachman