From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 27 11:28: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C3137B404 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 11:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 6907BAE1D7; Mon, 27 May 2002 11:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 11:28:00 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __STDC__ removal? Message-ID: <20020527182800.GG43189@elvis.mu.org> References: <20020526222546.GD43189@elvis.mu.org> <20020527.122158.65730013.imp@village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020527.122158.65730013.imp@village.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * M. Warner Losh [020527 11:22] wrote: > In message: <20020526222546.GD43189@elvis.mu.org> > Alfred Perlstein writes: > : NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always > : defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen > : is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid > : conflicts. > > I've already started doing the same. Feel free to beat me to it, > however, since I don't have many in my queue right now. I really havne't started, I just wanted to get the ball rolling if it needed it. :) -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message