From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 6 14:38: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60C937B401; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:38:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from scl8owa02.int.exodus.net (scl8out02.exodus.net [66.35.230.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C7843E88; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:37:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Maksim.Yevmenkin@exodus.net) Received: from scl8owa01.int.exodus.net ([66.35.230.241]) by scl8owa02.int.exodus.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:37:45 -0800 Received: from exodus.net ([206.220.227.147]) by scl8owa01.int.exodus.net over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:37:44 -0800 Message-ID: <3DC999B3.BFB324CA@exodus.net> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:37:39 -0800 From: Maksim Yevmenkin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josef Karthauser Cc: ticso@cicely.de, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USB problem (Who owns USB code in -current?) References: <3DC6BD74.25097511@exodus.net> <20021106195542.GG46686@cicely8.cicely.de> <3DC982FB.35F1A33A@exodus.net> <20021106213316.GA13438@genius.tao.org.uk> <20021106214349.GA47529@cicely8.cicely.de> <20021106222205.GA15133@genius.tao.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2002 22:37:44.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FEC2590:01C285E5] Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Josef Karthauser wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:43:50PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:33:16PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > > If it's inside the docking station I would assume that it's powered. > > > > Agreed - I had overread this detail. > > > > > On my machine with an external hub I do get messages about power budget > > > being exceeded so it's probably not that. > > > > That's a design issue. > > Some ports implement overcurrent protection by self healing fuses. > > Others do not even that. > > I've seen many awfull cheap implementations. > > > > Btw.: > > I had seen similar problems with a self build device on some ports. > > It turned out to be a problem with the device oscillator to not > > properly work under some conditions. > > Hmm, ok. Then this is the most likely explanation then. i doubt. both Linux and Windows have no problem with the device. everything else is the *same* (laptop, docking station, etc). do USB dumps make any sense? thanks, max To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message