Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:37:39 -0800 From: Maksim Yevmenkin <myevmenk@exodus.net> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ticso@cicely.de, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USB problem (Who owns USB code in -current?) Message-ID: <3DC999B3.BFB324CA@exodus.net> References: <3DC6BD74.25097511@exodus.net> <20021106195542.GG46686@cicely8.cicely.de> <3DC982FB.35F1A33A@exodus.net> <20021106213316.GA13438@genius.tao.org.uk> <20021106214349.GA47529@cicely8.cicely.de> <20021106222205.GA15133@genius.tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Josef Karthauser wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:43:50PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:33:16PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > > If it's inside the docking station I would assume that it's powered. > > > > Agreed - I had overread this detail. > > > > > On my machine with an external hub I do get messages about power budget > > > being exceeded so it's probably not that. > > > > That's a design issue. > > Some ports implement overcurrent protection by self healing fuses. > > Others do not even that. > > I've seen many awfull cheap implementations. > > > > Btw.: > > I had seen similar problems with a self build device on some ports. > > It turned out to be a problem with the device oscillator to not > > properly work under some conditions. > > Hmm, ok. Then this is the most likely explanation then. i doubt. both Linux and Windows have no problem with the device. everything else is the *same* (laptop, docking station, etc). do USB dumps make any sense? thanks, max To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DC999B3.BFB324CA>