From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 10 16:40:30 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233)
	id 33D1B106566B; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:30 +0000
From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
To: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20110310164030.GA39355@freebsd.org>
References: <4D78DF99.9030105@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D78DF99.9030105@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING] base gcc update to latest GPLv2 version
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:30 -0000

On Thu Mar 10 11, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Here is a base gcc upgrade to the latest GPLv2 version (rev. 127959).
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/head-gcc-422-prerelease.patch
> 
> Open questions:
> Do we want the "4.2.2 prerelase 20070831" version tag or stick to "4.2.1
> 20070831"?

i'd prefer "4.2.2 prerelase 20070831", since the ammount of changes and fixed
issues are quite high and would distinguish the current gcc base version from
the new one (whch includes all the patches).

> 
> Testing and comments are welcome.
> 
> Originally suggested by Pedro F. Giffuni in:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=gnu/153298
> 
> Resolved GCC bugs in this patch:
> 
> c++:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17763
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30535
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30917
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31337
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31941
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32108
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32112
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32346
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32898
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32992
> 
> debug:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32610
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32914
> 
> libstdc++:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33128
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33084
> 
> middle-end:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32563
> 
> rtl-optimization:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33148
> 
> tree-optimization:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25413
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32723
> 
> target:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32218

-- 
a13x