From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 12 18:22:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237F216A4DF for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8D343D5E for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:22:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6CIMHZt090278; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:22:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:18:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <93f8f44b0607061447k27adb556u306063b09b3d9b0d@mail.gmail.com> <93f8f44b0607111257j10923734i14309e1767abeb09@mail.gmail.com> <20060712043700.GJ98476@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20060712043700.GJ98476@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607121418.58293.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:22:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1594/Wed Jul 12 11:04:34 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Turion 64 X2 support in future versions of FreeBSD. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:22:29 -0000 On Wednesday 12 July 2006 00:37, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:57:49PM +0400 I heard the voice of > Michael, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > cpu0: timer 19005 129 > > cpu1: timer 9016 61 > > That looks a little odd... Possibly. Because cpu0's timer starts up sooner, it will generally have a higher total count (and uptime rate which is what vmstat -i shows you) than the other CPUs. It's hard to say if 10000 interrupts is normal for the differential though. That seems high. -- John Baldwin