Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:11:42 +0100 (BST) From: Andrew Gordon <arg@arg1.demon.co.uk> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DEVFS Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104251608560.38151-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010424175822.A95577@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:54:34PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > Don't, it's broken. It has no relation to the code in -current which > > > works quite well. > > > > > I learned that the hard way, shouldn't it be disabled so that it can't be enabled if its broken unless they are planning on doing work to fix it? > > DEVFS probably should be disabled/removed from RELENG_4.. Is RELENG_4 DEVFS completely broken, or merely broken in respect of disc devices? I'd been considering using it for discless (netboot) machines, though I admit I haven't tested it yet. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0104251608560.38151-100000>