From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 27 22:30:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA23365 for current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Apr 1997 22:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from labs.usn.blaze.net.au (labs.usn.blaze.net.au [203.17.53.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA23314 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 1997 22:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from labs.usn.blaze.net.au (local [127.0.0.1]) by labs.usn.blaze.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA05811; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 15:29:04 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <199704280529.PAA05811@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: Vincent Poy cc: John-Mark Gurney , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: termcap question In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Apr 1997 22:08:31 MST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 15:29:03 +1000 From: David Nugent Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Hmmm, the linux and linux-nocolor were pulled from my friend's > Linux machine and someone else said FreeBSD needs a vt220 termcap also. No, FreeBSD's vt220 works fine. I use it quite often. Of course, it may depend on which emulator you're using. :-) Some of them are pretty awful. ckermit's vt220 is about the best I've ever seen though. The problem with pulling termcap entries from other operating systems, though, is the question of compatiblity. It'd be nice if all termcaps were equal, but that doesn't agree with my experience. As usual, YYMV. David Nugent - Unique Computing Pty Ltd - Melbourne, Australia Voice +61-3-9791-9547 Data/BBS +61-3-9792-3507 3:632/348@fidonet davidn@freebsd.org davidn@blaze.net.au http://www.blaze.net.au/~davidn/