From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Wed Jun  7 10:20:33 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55200C08C43
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  7 Jun 2017 10:20:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from hmurray@megapathdsl.net)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net
 (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D00E6E13C
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Jun 2017 10:20:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from hmurray@megapathdsl.net)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C44C406063;
 Wed,  7 Jun 2017 03:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@sippysoft.com>
cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Subject: Re: Anybody using SO_BINTIME with IPv6?
In-Reply-To: Message from Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@sippysoft.com> of "Tue,
 06 Jun 2017 13:27:37 PDT."
 <CAH7qZfv8U6QPaybdzkY=b8UVGnSCrbAq9_jB2--S9ouFuit-sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 03:20:26 -0700
Message-Id: <20170607102026.8C44C406063@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 10:20:33 -0000

sobomax@sippysoft.com said:
> SO_BINTIME was ENOTSUPP with IPv6 from the day one.

Thanks.  Is that a literal ENOTSUPP?  Should I get an error from setsockopt?  
Or is that just shorthand for never-got-implemented?

Do you want a bug report?  If nothing else, the man page should be updated.

Just curious...  Why wasn't SO_BINTIME implemented for IPv6?  Since it works 
for IPv4 and SO_TIMESTAMP works for IPv4 and IPv6 I'd expect it would be easy 
to copy a few lines of code.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.