Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:07:12 -0700 From: "Matthew Jacob" <lydianconcepts@gmail.com> To: "Olivier Nicole" <on@cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with SLR SCSI tape Message-ID: <7579f7fb0606301807o211385d1mfcd0a6f08a9dbc76@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200606290241.k5T2fF10011216@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <200606280744.k5S7iEna073729@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <7579f7fb0606281140r72643ea4s9ca63199b19ab13e@mail.gmail.com> <200606290241.k5T2fF10011216@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hah. Thought it might. Tandberg: Repeat after me 1 million times; QIC is QIC is QIC is QIC. It can only do one filemark at a time- you can't make a second filemark as a recorded entity. On 6/28/06, Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> wrote: > > What's the eot model for the SLR? The SLR is wierd in that it tries to > > no be a QIC tape, but it is. Can you write to a tape *not* with > > amanda? As in > > > > mt -f /dev/nsa0 seteotmodel 1 > > mt -f /dev/nsa0 weof > > The model of eot was 2 filemarks. Changing to 1 seems to have solved > Amanda issue. > > Erase error was because I did not rewind the tape first. > > DD issue seems to be something else. > > But with 1 filemark I get everything working. > > Thanks. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7579f7fb0606301807o211385d1mfcd0a6f08a9dbc76>