From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 16 06:50:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F99D106566C for ; Sat, 16 May 2009 06:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from mx.egr.msu.edu (surfnturf.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A808FC19 for ; Sat, 16 May 2009 06:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A4C71F01F; Sat, 16 May 2009 02:50:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mx.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (surfnturf.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxPrXL2P5OEC; Sat, 16 May 2009 02:50:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65]) by mx.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1097A71F00F; Sat, 16 May 2009 02:50:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 21281) id 05F4EDCF; Sat, 16 May 2009 02:50:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:50:21 -0400 From: Adam McDougall To: Kip Macy Message-ID: <20090516065019.GM82547@egr.msu.edu> References: <3c1674c90905151702l81c2b88off1d2b2ffed39ca2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3c1674c90905151702l81c2b88off1d2b2ffed39ca2@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFT: ZFS MFC X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 06:50:22 -0000 On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 05:02:22PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote: I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/ The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a VM. Please do not use it with data you care about at this time. Thanks, Kip Seems to work for me so far. I had a zfs send hang part way through and with a notable speed difference depending on the direction but this is literally the first time I've tried zfs send/recv and the systems are setup different so I have no idea if it would have happened anyway. Eventually I could probably make these test systems more similar to give a fair test, but wanted to mention it so others could check. Thanks for working on the MFC, I'm excited to see progress there! It will play a factor in some upcoming server plans even if the MFC doesn't happen for months.