From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 09:15:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B833106566B; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-197-151.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25BF14DFD6; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F508F9C.5040505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:15:08 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120224 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florian Smeets References: <201202272335.q1RNZBJc081428@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201202272335.q1RNZBJc081428@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/ca_root_nss Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:15:09 -0000 Would '${LN} -sf' have been a safer choice? On 02/27/2012 15:35, Florian Smeets wrote: > flo 2012-02-27 23:35:11 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > security/ca_root_nss Makefile > Log: > make sure installation does not fail if for whatever reason the symlink in > /etc/ssl is still there on (re)install phase with ETCSYMLINK option set. > > Submitted by: mi > > Revision Changes Path > 1.19 +2 -1 ports/security/ca_root_nss/Makefile > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/ca_root_nss/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.18&r2=1.19&f=u > -- This .signature sanitized for your protection