From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  9 16:29:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B47D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 16:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web13121.mail.yahoo.com (web13121.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.174.83])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58CB943D31
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 16:29:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from shockwavebsd@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040310002922.2242.qmail@web13121.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [128.238.23.202] by web13121.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Tue, 09 Mar 2004 16:29:22 PST
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:29:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Doom Neine <shockwavebsd@yahoo.com>
To: Bin Ren <br260@cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <584A178C-7226-11D8-BBA4-000A9576014E@cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: garbage string as cpu identifier
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:29:22 -0000

thanks a lot, forgot to cc this to the list
so yes, seems simple enough and i've already done what
you asked, but i haven't replaced the current one with
the one i just modified of course, i'll try to rebuild
with the new changes after about 24 hours if no one
else has a better suggestion or gives me a reason not
to do so by then

thanks

Nathanael
--- Bin Ren <br260@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm using 5.2-current. Maybe the file has
> been updated. The patch is very very simple:
> replace two lines with 6 lines. Is it possible
> for you to apply the patch manually? Line
> number is in the patch file. Thanks.
> 
> You must be 'root' to have write permission.
> 
> -- Bin
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com