From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug 30 14:34:14 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id OAA02699
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 14:34:14 -0700
Received: from uuneo.neosoft.com (uuneo.NeoSoft.COM [198.64.84.252])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA02689
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 14:34:13 -0700
Received: from ris1.UUCP (spegcs@localhost) by uuneo.neosoft.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with UUCP id QAA26378 for freebsd.org!hackers; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 16:18:40 -0500
Received: by ris1.nmti.com (smail2.5)
	id AA08778; 30 Aug 95 12:11:09 CDT (Wed)
Received: by sonic.nmti.com; id AA17853; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:37:14 -0500
From: peter@nmti.com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <9508301737.AA17853@sonic.nmti.com.nmti.com>
Subject: Re: Gritching about XFree86 and serial port naming
To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:37:13 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, piero@strider.ibenet.it, hackers@freebsd.org,
        peter@nmti.com
In-Reply-To: <199508300814.SAA26623@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Aug 30, 95 06:14:16 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 236       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I meant cuaa0 would be bogus.  Who runs getty on their mouse port?

Who cares about modem control on their mouse port? I don't use the ttyXX
ports for anything that doesn't need modem control. Just seems cleaner to
me. Am I confused?