From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 30 15:03:36 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD76816A400
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:03:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jester@panix.com)
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99D013C4AD
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:03:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jester@panix.com)
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2])
	by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4B958ADE;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:03:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from jester@localhost)
	by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id l3UF3Zs09920;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:03:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:03:35 -0400
From: Jesse Sheidlower <jester@panix.com>
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Message-ID: <20070430150335.GA20848@panix.com>
References: <20070427195241.GA27697@panix.com> <463263C0.3050006@root.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <463263C0.3050006@root.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Suspend on SMP: Progress?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:03:36 -0000

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:57:36PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
>
> > Basically, has there been any progress on suspend/resume on
> > SMP laptops?

[...]

> No work has been done for this.  Basically the APs need to be stopped
> during suspend and restarted during resume.

Thanks for the response.

Given that SMP seems to be the direction that processors are
going nowadays, I'm a little surprised that getting it working
under ACPI isn't a higher priority. (I fully acknowledge and
appreciate the amount of work you guys put into the project,
work which I'd never be able to do, etc. etc.) If user input
is considered, I'd like to put in a vote for this being bumped
up the list.

Thanks very much.

Jesse Sheidlower