From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Apr 28 22:01:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA25103
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 22:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from caliban.dihelix.com (caliban.dihelix.com [198.180.136.138])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA25094
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 22:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from langfod@localhost) by caliban.dihelix.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) id TAA05083; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 19:00:51 -1000 (HST)
Message-Id: <199704290500.TAA05083@caliban.dihelix.com>
Subject: Re: pgp and unzip incompatible?
In-Reply-To: <199704290401.VAA19197@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Apr 28, 97 09:01:09 pm"
To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 19:00:51 -1000 (HST)
Cc: ache@nagual.ru, ports@freebsd.org
From: "David Langford" <langfod@dihelix.com>
X-blank-line: This space intentionaly left blank.
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Actually I have been meaning to ask for quite some time WHY
these ports (lynx,slang-lynx,pgp,tripwire etc) depend on unzip.

All of those have tar distributions. I would think we would try to mak
ports depend on as little as possible.

Thanks,

-David Langford
 langfod@dihelix.com

>I get this with the latest unzip and pgp ports....
>
>Satoshi
>-------
>>> Checksum OK for pgp262s.zip.
>===>  Extracting for pgp-2.6.2
>===>  pgp-2.6.2 depends on executable: gmake - found
>===>  pgp-2.6.2 depends on executable: unzip - found
>===>  pgp-2.6.2 depends on shared library: rsaref\.2\.0 - found
>cd /ccd/ports/security/pgp/work; unzip -q -aa pgp262si
>*** Error code 1
>
>Stop.
>