From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 25 20:06:49 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7482516A4CE; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:06:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3B8DC43D41; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:06:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DADCB512BF; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:06:33 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Mohan Srinivasan <mohan_srinivasan@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20041225200633.GC56931@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20041225070022.GA93123@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20041225173524.33634.qmail@web80606.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041225173524.33634.qmail@web80606.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: ps@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
cc: mohans <mohans@yahoo-inc.com>
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Processes stuck in nfsreq
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:06:49 -0000


--+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 09:35:24AM -0800, Mohan Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> If the box is still in that state, can you force a core ?
>=20
> The trace below shows the process blocked on nfs_request()->msleep.
> If the process shows up as waiting on "nfsreq", it would be msleep'ing
> from nfs_reply(), not from nfs_request(). There's only one msleep()
> call in nfs_request() (nfs_socket.c:1125), but that is for "nqnfstry".
> The msleep("nfsreq") only happens from nfs_reply() (unless nfs_reply()=20
> has gotten inlined).

It's possible the sleep channel was something else, I transcribed that
from memory because by that time I couldn't get back in to the box to
do anything.

Kris

--+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBzchIWry0BWjoQKURAhSvAJ9VWFF1Jca520VJE3EGMoOfNPrznQCgp7XI
SqzEM9q36F3nWOk3lcc8pZI=
=0Wzg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX--