From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 13 10:16:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED050106564A for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A598FC08 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so3904915yen.13 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 03:16:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qYEQVg7pGbtEdRHP+7jv6bjTTgiz9/lSv6pjsaGTUb4=; b=HebaSpcYs+XoR0c70QQ9y7bp0UrBP2n7P8z7/3zWAvK+nZw+1F2eqACWs6isKF62ss urJeQJCwyk9T2SWrbxwP0q5wm+IltC+mmoCdaRiYKU9Wcj14F93B23OXIR1stLnQdZ/o bgsVirGc54dl22+GzVwzDw9K0uwu4MfeEFgrg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=qYEQVg7pGbtEdRHP+7jv6bjTTgiz9/lSv6pjsaGTUb4=; b=YxNE3oSl3TtYDfCWkzlTmTKuLCE5icoeUCHbbFRE0bfHUCsX6RJf4PS4eh9kg8z/lj qozFT7SbraaqiCBVQYvi+NwBepBs5N44PvrEFuyriFW4IUNY89aiw9OLq8ErjvrTeSYN INi3nhLSERzaIuuDWGV0PRf5TMv6l8AU3U8UPAv0zJJnzLzhBgx4CazfDYMnjRW45qrP j4sIo90BzQJLhlgN/Ju/P37lDzunzJdkXqBarD69q7bk5GWxsUt1ZcbusvTRCyJI8jl2 vzWd6RQtldTbYxyZyyVhQHrjWry05v1sa1EGxNT11hOiyjIHCuzwC1/KPXDE09hHogaO BTkA== Received: by 10.236.185.198 with SMTP id u46mr503700yhm.33.1342174577853; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 03:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm6948881anm.4.2012.07.13.03.16.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 03:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3WYVKW0L39z2CG4F for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:16:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:16:14 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120713061614.4fb43bd3@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20120712191306.GA24943@neutralgood.org> <4FFF3386.1060109@gmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmfLMxpPpSYhtDYpamL7GKZAM1kj/7gh2VxbEOP0rVSgwW9DyRJ62XWRfb+yp+xKhos5o0Z Subject: Re: Is there a way to run FreeBSD ports through port 80? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:16:19 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:24 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar articulated: > > We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need > > for the severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the > > sites accessible meaning that we need to request access if we need > > to go somewhere not governed by that proxy. > this make sense. > > just blocking everything except 80 is pure nonsense. Not if that is specifically what the OP is attempting to accomplish. Whether or not you feel it is nonsense is about as relative to the problem as tits on a bull. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________