From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 6 14:02:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7404F16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D4F13C471 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so1946452nzh for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:02:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pVpvlBEhOPtatMlkO+KP4mSSlpaYnLcyDvcIT6jhBLMdVvhVyIa2PhMv1snQqKJChvUzT9sf/u36HTo95IkTP8TyXlLAKjCR+3iz+kb0UoF4wRznkXd3JEigmSkyrSsrF/oUmJuguex9roXdJ5/SDjXoiwBrFB4r43vSRRqVrbE= Received: by 10.65.43.5 with SMTP id v5mr12953552qbj.1170770530403; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:02:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.11.16 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 06:02:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60702060602x20e34eb9w715c786dbf6dd34e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:02:10 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Dak Ghatikachalam Subject: Re: Question:encryption tool. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:02:11 -0000 > Thanks a lot, Our current backup system is veritas netbackup, and changing > that to entire bacula is best thing for me, May I ask why you would prefer Bacula over NetBackup? I'm just curious, because having worked with both, I personally prefer NetBackup. > so they wanted me encrypt these files, that is on the backup location > before the netbackup scheduler picks up these files. > > Database is getting backed up to a disk location and from there netbackup > agent picks up and writes it into the tape , but we have these 13 flat files > that go into offsite which really needs encryption and decryption logic in > place upon after restore back to disk . If those databases are all Oracle instances, then you might want to take a look at Oracle Secure Backup. It does exactly what you need. More info here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/secure-backup/index.html Cheers, David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122