From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 07:39:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5859737B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 07:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sauron.fto.de (p15106025.pureserver.info [217.160.140.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939CF43FA3 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 07:39:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hschaefer@fto.de) Received: from localhost (localhost.fto.de [127.0.0.1]) by sauron.fto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE3325C125; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:38:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sauron.fto.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sauron [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10693-02; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:38:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from giskard.foundation.hs (p509194D7.dip.t-dialin.net [80.145.148.215]) by sauron.fto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE31925C122; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:38:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daneel.foundation.hs (daneel.foundation.hs [192.168.20.2]) by giskard.foundation.hs (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA97625; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:39:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hschaefer@fto.de) Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:39:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Heiko Schaefer X-X-Sender: heiko@daneel.foundation.hs To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <32877.1053439413@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20030520163704.X60060@daneel.foundation.hs> References: <32877.1053439413@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fto.de cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gbde performance question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:39:39 -0000 > >well, from what i read, any modern cpu should be capable to do raw aes in > >the order of magnitude of hundreds of MB/s. > > Don't confuse Mbit/sec and Mbyte/sec :-) argh. i did. that's quite stupid %) ok, that reduces it to a factor like 2-4x at most. that's not all that troubling - i'm happy for now, then :) thanks, Heiko -- Free Software. Why put up with inferior code and antisocial corporations? http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html