Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jona Joachim <jaj13@web.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make "make" ignore build errors Message-ID: <20060610170358.GA39497@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <448AA65C.2020707@web.de> References: <44885E00.2000606@gmail.com> <20060609184530.GB1615@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <448AA65C.2020707@web.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:00:44PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: > Vasil Dimov wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:27:28PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I wanted to know if it is possible to tell "make" that it should ignore > >> when an error occurs in the building process. > >> I'm the maintainer of the devel/tigcc port which is a collection of > >> tools to build binaries for the Texas Instruments graphing calculators > >> which run on Motorola 68k processors. The main part of this collection > >> is actually a patched gcc built for m68k-coff. > >> Building gcc 4.0.2 (the version supported by the latest tigcc) for 68k > >> will always fail because it will try to build stuff for m68k using the > >> GNU AS which it finds in the path, which will not support the 68k > >> platform in most cases: "as: unrecognized option `-mc68020'" > >> This isn't fatal however because when this point is reached in the > >> Makefile everything that is needed is already built and everything that > >> follows is not needed. I know that this is a dirty hack but there is no > >> other trivial way. > >> Is there a way to ignore this error and resume the build process for t= he > >> other tools? > >> > > You certainly do not want this! It will ignore not just this error but > > also any other errors that may occur. I would suggest that you patch the > > software's Makefile to skip the unnecessary part of the build. >=20 > Hi! > The problem is that the Makefile that causes the problem is only > generated during the make process. I would have to patch the files that > generate this Makefile. Yes. Kris --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEivt+Wry0BWjoQKURAqEYAJ9ugeitAA9vfnbzFenpRmtc9otMYQCeP6kp zNUp/8DBWsAeh4CZJclQDlU= =Fuz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060610170358.GA39497>