Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:09:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230298] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 18.2.0 Message-ID: <bug-230298-7141-pO5YR0Fo2I@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230298-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-230298-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230298 --- Comment #6 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #5) > These are the ones I'm talking about. Known unknowns? > In general, it's been only lightly tested, What can you expect from volunteers? Mesa updates aren't exactly exciting. However, updating frequently allows to catch regressions early, test revert= ing stuff or ask upstream for help while responsible folks are still active and their memory is fresh. Being available to fix regressions after landing is sometimes more important than how much testing was done locally. > I haven't had time to look through this myself properly as well. Like in bug 227423? I'm not expecting much. > I don't see why we can't hold off on this for a week or two more, to get = it at least a little more well-tested. OK. Landing now would require backporting patch-level updates to 2018Q4. The best time is shortly after 2018Q4, earning the full cycle of testing to sort any issues out. Even then it'd be nice to MFH mesa-dri-18.1.9 culminating t= he (upstream) testing of 18.1 branch. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230298-7141-pO5YR0Fo2I>