From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 18 23:21:24 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EA31D37B401; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 23:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snark.ratmir.ru (snark.ratmir.ru [213.24.248.177])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC7D143FDD; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 23:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@snark.ratmir.ru)
Received: from snark.ratmir.ru (freebsd@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snark.ratmir.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3J6LLC2070372;
	Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:21:22 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from freebsd@snark.ratmir.ru)
Received: (from freebsd@localhost)
	by snark.ratmir.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3J6LLZj070371;
	Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:21:21 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:21:21 +0400
From: Alex Semenyaka <alexs@ratmir.ru>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030419062121.GA70121@snark.ratmir.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Subject: Slow vipw and fast pwd_mkdb
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 06:21:25 -0000

Hello,

could somebody to comment PR bin/51148? It is suggestion how to pass
a value of cache size to pwd_mkdb when we are doing vipw or such.
It can give a greate speed-up when master.passwd is really big (and
sometimes it is). Appropriate cache size can make process 10 to 100
or more times faster. I gave the results of measurements in that
problem report.

Thanks in advance!

							SY, Alex